Cone extreme points and faces (Q1095769): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247x(87)90087-4 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2099371283 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 11:09, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Cone extreme points and faces |
scientific article |
Statements
Cone extreme points and faces (English)
0 references
1987
0 references
We are interested in the relationship between a transitive and antisymmetric notion of preference given in \({\mathbb{R}}^ p\) by a dominance structure and the notion of face of a set whether convex or not. No particular type of mappings with values in that space is considered. We first study the case where the dominance structure is given by a constant cone \(\Lambda\). We show that the bounded faces of \(S+\Lambda\) are contained in the set Ext[S\(| \Lambda]\) of \(\Lambda\)-extreme points of S for every \(S\subset {\mathbb{R}}^ p\) and, then, assuming S is \(\Lambda\)- convex we prove that Ext[S\(| \Lambda]\) is a union of faces of \(S+\Lambda\). This result is improved by setting very wide conditions which ensure that Ext[S\(| \Lambda]\) is the union of the bounded faces of \(S+\Lambda\). Thus, the cumbersome question of dominance or nondominance of a face of S can be simplified under these conditions. Finally, we point out how these results can be useful to find the set of all nondominated points of a set S, by using a Yu's sequence, when the dominance structure is not constant.
0 references
transitive and antisymmetric notion of preference
0 references
dominance structure
0 references
face of a set
0 references
0 references