Compositional Z: confluence proofs for permutative conversion (Q514511): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Normalize DOI. |
Normalize DOI. |
||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S11225-016-9673-0 / rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S11225-016-9673-0 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 20:00, 9 December 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Compositional Z: confluence proofs for permutative conversion |
scientific article |
Statements
Compositional Z: confluence proofs for permutative conversion (English)
0 references
2 March 2017
0 references
The Z-theorem of \textit{P. Dehorney} and \textit{Z. van Oostrom} [``Proving confluence by monotonic single-step upperbound functions'', in: Logical models of reasoning and computation (LMRC-08) (2008)] allows the proof of confluence for a number of variants of the \(\lambda\)-calculus. In the current paper, the authors generalise this to a compositional Z-theorem, which is easily proved from the Z-theorem. The new theorem allows, in addition, proofs of confluence for \(\lambda\)-calculi corresponding to intuitionistic and classical natural deduction with disjunction and permutative conversions as well as a \(\lambda\)-calculus with explicit substitution.
0 references
lambda calculus
0 references
lambda-mu calculus
0 references
confluence
0 references
permutative conversion
0 references
0 references
0 references