Maximal ideals in module categories and applications (Q1656712): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Normalize DOI.
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s10485-017-9505-z / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S10485-017-9505-Z / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 01:21, 11 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Maximal ideals in module categories and applications
scientific article

    Statements

    Maximal ideals in module categories and applications (English)
    0 references
    10 August 2018
    0 references
    \textit{A. Facchini} proved [Contemp. Math. 480, 139--151 (2009; Zbl 1196.16002)] that the simple modules over a ring \(R\) correspond bijectively to the minimal ideals in the module category. In the paper under review, it is shown that module categories (more generally: Grothendieck categories) are ``big'' in the sense that there are no maximal ideals. The proof introduces a partial order on the objects which allows to built strictly increasing chains of ideals. The partial order is then applied to more general preadditive categories.
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references