Typical dynamics of plane rational maps with equal degrees (Q317003): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / author
 
Property / author: Han Liu / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / review text
 
Consider a dominant rational map of the complex projective plane \(\mathbb P^2\), denoted by \(f=[f_1:f_2:f_3]\) in homogeneous coordinates, where \(f_i\) are homogeneous polynomials with the same degree, and have no common factors of positive degree. The algebraic degree is the common degree of the \(f_i\), denoted by \(d(f)\). The first dynamical degree is the limit \[ \lambda_1(f):=\lim_{n\to\infty}d(f^n)^{1/n}. \] For any generic point \(p\in\mathbb P^2\), the number of elements in \(\{f^{-1}(p)\}\) is said to be the topological degree, denoted by \(\lambda_2(f)\). Since \(\lambda_2(f^n)=\lambda_2(f)^n\), the second dynamical degree of \(f\) is \(\lambda_2(f)\). Denote by \(\mathcal I=\mathcal I(f)\subset\mathbb P^2\) as the common zeros of the components \(f_i\), where \(f\) is not well defined. For any point \(p\in\mathcal I\), let \(f(p)\) consist of all the possible limits \(\lim_{p_k\to p}f(p_k)\). If \(f(\mathbb P^2\setminus\mathcal I)\) is not contained in an algebraic curve, then \(f\) is called dominant. If \(V\) is an irreducible curve with \(f(V)\) a point, \(V\) is said to be exceptional. The authors show that if \(d(f)=\lambda_2(f)\geq 2\), then there is an open subset of linear maps \(T\in\mathrm{Aut}(\mathbb P^2)\) such that \(d(f)=\lambda_1(f_T)=\lambda_2(f_T)\), the map \(f_T:=T\circ f\) has two invariant and ergodic measures \(\mu\) and \(\nu\) of maximal entropy \(\log d(f)\), where \(f_T\) is uniformly hyperbolic of saddle type on \(\mathrm{supp}(\nu)\), \(f_T\) is uniformly expanding on \(\mathrm{supp}(\mu)\), neither measure is supported in an algebraic curve, where the saddle type means that one Lyapunov exponent is positive and the other is negative. Some other properties are the consequences of the proof of the main results. The tricky part in the proofs of the main results is based on the choice the linear map \(T\in\mathrm{Aut}(P^2)\). Take a line \(L_0\subset\mathbb P^2\) and \(p_0\in\mathbb P^2\) with \(p_0\not\in L_0\) such that {\parindent=0.7cm\begin{itemize}\item[(A)] \(p_0\not\in f(\mathcal I)\cup f(L_0)\); \item[(B)] \(L_0\cap\mathcal I=\emptyset\); \item[(C)] \(p_0\) is a regular value of \(f\) with \(\lambda_2\) distinct preimages; \item[(D)] \(\deg f(L_0)\geq 2\), and \(L_0\) is not exceptional. \end{itemize}} And, consider a surjective linear map \(T_0:\mathbb P^2\setminus\{p_0\}\to L_0\), and for any \(\delta>0\), set \[ \mathcal T(T_0,\delta):=\{T\in\mathrm{Aut}(\mathbb P^2):\mathrm{dist}(T(p),T_0(p))<\delta,\,\forall p\not\in B_{\delta}(p_0)\}. \] For any given sufficiently small \(\epsilon>0\), there is \(\delta>0\) such that for any \(T\in\mathcal T(T_0,\delta)\), the existence of the measure \(\nu\) of saddle type for \(f_T\) is based on (A), (B), and (D), and the choice of the map \(T_0\), where the measure \(\nu\) is on \(B_{\epsilon}(L_0)\) with entropy \(\log d(f)\), and the induced one-dimensional map \(f_0=T_0\circ f\) is hyperbolic. On the other hand, for any given sufficiently small \(\epsilon>0\), there exists \(\delta>0\) such that for any \(T\in\mathcal T(T_0,\delta)\), \(f_T\) is uniformly expanding on \(\mathcal A=\cap_{n\geq 0}f^{-n}_T(B_{\epsilon}(f^{-1}(p_0)))\), and the support of \(\mu\) is contained in \(B_{\epsilon}(f^{-1}(p_0))\) by using (A), (B), and (C). By contradiction and some elegant arguments, the authors prove that neither measure is supported in an algebraic curve. In the last section, the authors study a family of rational maps \(f_t=T_t\circ f\), \(t\in[0,1]\), where \(f=g\circ h\), \[ g[x_1:x_2:x_3]=[x^2_1:x^2_2:x^2_3], \] \[ h[x_1:x_2:x_3]=[x_1(-x_1+x_2+x_3):x_2(x_1-x_2+x_3):x_3(x_1+x_2-x_3)], \] and \[ T_t[x_1:x_2:x_3]=[x_1:x_2:x_3]-\frac{1-t}{3}(x_1+x_2+x_3)[1:1:1],\;t\in[0,1]. \] By symmetry of the map \(f\), the authors show the main results more directly for \(t\in(0,1]\) close enough to \(0\). And, the support of the measure \(\mu\) is contained in \(\mathbb{RP}^2\subset\mathbb{P}^2\), whereas for the measure \(\nu\) it is not the case.
Property / review text: Consider a dominant rational map of the complex projective plane \(\mathbb P^2\), denoted by \(f=[f_1:f_2:f_3]\) in homogeneous coordinates, where \(f_i\) are homogeneous polynomials with the same degree, and have no common factors of positive degree. The algebraic degree is the common degree of the \(f_i\), denoted by \(d(f)\). The first dynamical degree is the limit \[ \lambda_1(f):=\lim_{n\to\infty}d(f^n)^{1/n}. \] For any generic point \(p\in\mathbb P^2\), the number of elements in \(\{f^{-1}(p)\}\) is said to be the topological degree, denoted by \(\lambda_2(f)\). Since \(\lambda_2(f^n)=\lambda_2(f)^n\), the second dynamical degree of \(f\) is \(\lambda_2(f)\). Denote by \(\mathcal I=\mathcal I(f)\subset\mathbb P^2\) as the common zeros of the components \(f_i\), where \(f\) is not well defined. For any point \(p\in\mathcal I\), let \(f(p)\) consist of all the possible limits \(\lim_{p_k\to p}f(p_k)\). If \(f(\mathbb P^2\setminus\mathcal I)\) is not contained in an algebraic curve, then \(f\) is called dominant. If \(V\) is an irreducible curve with \(f(V)\) a point, \(V\) is said to be exceptional. The authors show that if \(d(f)=\lambda_2(f)\geq 2\), then there is an open subset of linear maps \(T\in\mathrm{Aut}(\mathbb P^2)\) such that \(d(f)=\lambda_1(f_T)=\lambda_2(f_T)\), the map \(f_T:=T\circ f\) has two invariant and ergodic measures \(\mu\) and \(\nu\) of maximal entropy \(\log d(f)\), where \(f_T\) is uniformly hyperbolic of saddle type on \(\mathrm{supp}(\nu)\), \(f_T\) is uniformly expanding on \(\mathrm{supp}(\mu)\), neither measure is supported in an algebraic curve, where the saddle type means that one Lyapunov exponent is positive and the other is negative. Some other properties are the consequences of the proof of the main results. The tricky part in the proofs of the main results is based on the choice the linear map \(T\in\mathrm{Aut}(P^2)\). Take a line \(L_0\subset\mathbb P^2\) and \(p_0\in\mathbb P^2\) with \(p_0\not\in L_0\) such that {\parindent=0.7cm\begin{itemize}\item[(A)] \(p_0\not\in f(\mathcal I)\cup f(L_0)\); \item[(B)] \(L_0\cap\mathcal I=\emptyset\); \item[(C)] \(p_0\) is a regular value of \(f\) with \(\lambda_2\) distinct preimages; \item[(D)] \(\deg f(L_0)\geq 2\), and \(L_0\) is not exceptional. \end{itemize}} And, consider a surjective linear map \(T_0:\mathbb P^2\setminus\{p_0\}\to L_0\), and for any \(\delta>0\), set \[ \mathcal T(T_0,\delta):=\{T\in\mathrm{Aut}(\mathbb P^2):\mathrm{dist}(T(p),T_0(p))<\delta,\,\forall p\not\in B_{\delta}(p_0)\}. \] For any given sufficiently small \(\epsilon>0\), there is \(\delta>0\) such that for any \(T\in\mathcal T(T_0,\delta)\), the existence of the measure \(\nu\) of saddle type for \(f_T\) is based on (A), (B), and (D), and the choice of the map \(T_0\), where the measure \(\nu\) is on \(B_{\epsilon}(L_0)\) with entropy \(\log d(f)\), and the induced one-dimensional map \(f_0=T_0\circ f\) is hyperbolic. On the other hand, for any given sufficiently small \(\epsilon>0\), there exists \(\delta>0\) such that for any \(T\in\mathcal T(T_0,\delta)\), \(f_T\) is uniformly expanding on \(\mathcal A=\cap_{n\geq 0}f^{-n}_T(B_{\epsilon}(f^{-1}(p_0)))\), and the support of \(\mu\) is contained in \(B_{\epsilon}(f^{-1}(p_0))\) by using (A), (B), and (C). By contradiction and some elegant arguments, the authors prove that neither measure is supported in an algebraic curve. In the last section, the authors study a family of rational maps \(f_t=T_t\circ f\), \(t\in[0,1]\), where \(f=g\circ h\), \[ g[x_1:x_2:x_3]=[x^2_1:x^2_2:x^2_3], \] \[ h[x_1:x_2:x_3]=[x_1(-x_1+x_2+x_3):x_2(x_1-x_2+x_3):x_3(x_1+x_2-x_3)], \] and \[ T_t[x_1:x_2:x_3]=[x_1:x_2:x_3]-\frac{1-t}{3}(x_1+x_2+x_3)[1:1:1],\;t\in[0,1]. \] By symmetry of the map \(f\), the authors show the main results more directly for \(t\in(0,1]\) close enough to \(0\). And, the support of the measure \(\mu\) is contained in \(\mathbb{RP}^2\subset\mathbb{P}^2\), whereas for the measure \(\nu\) it is not the case. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Xu Zhang / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 37F10 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 32H50 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6631461 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
algebraic curve
Property / zbMATH Keywords: algebraic curve / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
rational maps
Property / zbMATH Keywords: rational maps / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
ergodic properties
Property / zbMATH Keywords: ergodic properties / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
dynamical degree
Property / zbMATH Keywords: dynamical degree / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 01:10, 28 June 2023

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Typical dynamics of plane rational maps with equal degrees
scientific article

    Statements

    Typical dynamics of plane rational maps with equal degrees (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    30 September 2016
    0 references
    Consider a dominant rational map of the complex projective plane \(\mathbb P^2\), denoted by \(f=[f_1:f_2:f_3]\) in homogeneous coordinates, where \(f_i\) are homogeneous polynomials with the same degree, and have no common factors of positive degree. The algebraic degree is the common degree of the \(f_i\), denoted by \(d(f)\). The first dynamical degree is the limit \[ \lambda_1(f):=\lim_{n\to\infty}d(f^n)^{1/n}. \] For any generic point \(p\in\mathbb P^2\), the number of elements in \(\{f^{-1}(p)\}\) is said to be the topological degree, denoted by \(\lambda_2(f)\). Since \(\lambda_2(f^n)=\lambda_2(f)^n\), the second dynamical degree of \(f\) is \(\lambda_2(f)\). Denote by \(\mathcal I=\mathcal I(f)\subset\mathbb P^2\) as the common zeros of the components \(f_i\), where \(f\) is not well defined. For any point \(p\in\mathcal I\), let \(f(p)\) consist of all the possible limits \(\lim_{p_k\to p}f(p_k)\). If \(f(\mathbb P^2\setminus\mathcal I)\) is not contained in an algebraic curve, then \(f\) is called dominant. If \(V\) is an irreducible curve with \(f(V)\) a point, \(V\) is said to be exceptional. The authors show that if \(d(f)=\lambda_2(f)\geq 2\), then there is an open subset of linear maps \(T\in\mathrm{Aut}(\mathbb P^2)\) such that \(d(f)=\lambda_1(f_T)=\lambda_2(f_T)\), the map \(f_T:=T\circ f\) has two invariant and ergodic measures \(\mu\) and \(\nu\) of maximal entropy \(\log d(f)\), where \(f_T\) is uniformly hyperbolic of saddle type on \(\mathrm{supp}(\nu)\), \(f_T\) is uniformly expanding on \(\mathrm{supp}(\mu)\), neither measure is supported in an algebraic curve, where the saddle type means that one Lyapunov exponent is positive and the other is negative. Some other properties are the consequences of the proof of the main results. The tricky part in the proofs of the main results is based on the choice the linear map \(T\in\mathrm{Aut}(P^2)\). Take a line \(L_0\subset\mathbb P^2\) and \(p_0\in\mathbb P^2\) with \(p_0\not\in L_0\) such that {\parindent=0.7cm\begin{itemize}\item[(A)] \(p_0\not\in f(\mathcal I)\cup f(L_0)\); \item[(B)] \(L_0\cap\mathcal I=\emptyset\); \item[(C)] \(p_0\) is a regular value of \(f\) with \(\lambda_2\) distinct preimages; \item[(D)] \(\deg f(L_0)\geq 2\), and \(L_0\) is not exceptional. \end{itemize}} And, consider a surjective linear map \(T_0:\mathbb P^2\setminus\{p_0\}\to L_0\), and for any \(\delta>0\), set \[ \mathcal T(T_0,\delta):=\{T\in\mathrm{Aut}(\mathbb P^2):\mathrm{dist}(T(p),T_0(p))<\delta,\,\forall p\not\in B_{\delta}(p_0)\}. \] For any given sufficiently small \(\epsilon>0\), there is \(\delta>0\) such that for any \(T\in\mathcal T(T_0,\delta)\), the existence of the measure \(\nu\) of saddle type for \(f_T\) is based on (A), (B), and (D), and the choice of the map \(T_0\), where the measure \(\nu\) is on \(B_{\epsilon}(L_0)\) with entropy \(\log d(f)\), and the induced one-dimensional map \(f_0=T_0\circ f\) is hyperbolic. On the other hand, for any given sufficiently small \(\epsilon>0\), there exists \(\delta>0\) such that for any \(T\in\mathcal T(T_0,\delta)\), \(f_T\) is uniformly expanding on \(\mathcal A=\cap_{n\geq 0}f^{-n}_T(B_{\epsilon}(f^{-1}(p_0)))\), and the support of \(\mu\) is contained in \(B_{\epsilon}(f^{-1}(p_0))\) by using (A), (B), and (C). By contradiction and some elegant arguments, the authors prove that neither measure is supported in an algebraic curve. In the last section, the authors study a family of rational maps \(f_t=T_t\circ f\), \(t\in[0,1]\), where \(f=g\circ h\), \[ g[x_1:x_2:x_3]=[x^2_1:x^2_2:x^2_3], \] \[ h[x_1:x_2:x_3]=[x_1(-x_1+x_2+x_3):x_2(x_1-x_2+x_3):x_3(x_1+x_2-x_3)], \] and \[ T_t[x_1:x_2:x_3]=[x_1:x_2:x_3]-\frac{1-t}{3}(x_1+x_2+x_3)[1:1:1],\;t\in[0,1]. \] By symmetry of the map \(f\), the authors show the main results more directly for \(t\in(0,1]\) close enough to \(0\). And, the support of the measure \(\mu\) is contained in \(\mathbb{RP}^2\subset\mathbb{P}^2\), whereas for the measure \(\nu\) it is not the case.
    0 references
    0 references
    algebraic curve
    0 references
    rational maps
    0 references
    ergodic properties
    0 references
    dynamical degree
    0 references

    Identifiers