The divisor problem for binary cubic forms (Q449712)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 04:16, 30 January 2024 by Import240129110155 (talk | contribs) (Added link to MaRDI item.)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The divisor problem for binary cubic forms
scientific article

    Statements

    The divisor problem for binary cubic forms (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    31 August 2012
    0 references
    Let \(C(x,y)\) be an integral cubic form which factors over the rationals into linearly independent linear forms, as \(L_1L_2L_3\). Then it is shown that \[ \sum_{x,y\leq X}\tau(C(x,y))=X^2P_C(\log X)+O_{\varepsilon,C}(X^{7/4+\varepsilon}) \] for some cubic polynomial \(P_C\). For comparison, the best known error term for the case in which \(C\) is irreducible has the exponent \(7/4\) replaced by \(15/8\) (see \textit{S. Daniel} [J. Reine Angew. Math. 507, 107--129 (1999; Zbl 0913.11041)]). The proof draws heavily from the work of \textit{R. de la Bretèche} and \textit{T. D. Browning} [Compos. Math. 144, No. 6, 1375--1402 (2008; Zbl 1234.11132), and J. Reine Angew. Math. 646, 1--44 (2010; Zbl 1204.11158)]. The author also considers the ternary additive divisor problem described by \[ T_h(X):=\sum_{h<n\leq X}\tau(n-h)\tau(n)\tau(n+h). \] It is conjectured that \(T_h(X)\sim c_hX(\log X)^3\) for a suitable explicitly given constant \(c_h>0\), but this seems far out of reach. In support of the conjecture it is shown that \[ \sum_{h\leq H}\left(T_h(X)-c_hX(\log X)^3\right)=o(HX(\log x)^3) \] for \(H\geq X^{3/4+\varepsilon}\), for any fixed \(\varepsilon>0\).
    0 references
    divisor function
    0 references
    cubic form
    0 references
    linear factors
    0 references
    sum
    0 references
    ternary additive divisor problem
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references