Local weak simultaneous resolution for high rational ranks (Q1368047)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 20:32, 19 March 2024 by Openalex240319060354 (talk | contribs) (Set OpenAlex properties.)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Local weak simultaneous resolution for high rational ranks
scientific article

    Statements

    Local weak simultaneous resolution for high rational ranks (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    7 April 1999
    0 references
    In 1956, Abhyankar stated his local weak simultaneous resolution theorem for algebraic surfaces. By using this theorem, he was able to eliminate the use of Zariski's factorization theorem for proving the local uniformization theorem for algebraic surfaces (a step in Zariski's plan for proving resolution of singularities). The author thinks that generalizing the local weak simultaneous resolution theorem could be useful to show local uniformization for higher-dimensional varieties since Zariski's factorization theorem is not true for these varieties. In this sense, he gives a partial generalization which does not account for all possible rational ranks. The concrete result (section 3 of the paper) which is proved from a monomialization theorem for ordered semigroups (section 2) is the following: Let \(K\) be an \(n\)-dimensional function field over an algebraically closed field \(k\). Assume that either the characteristic of \(k\) is zero or that it is positive and \(n\leq 3\). Let \(L/K\) be a finite algebraic extension. Let \(v\) be a valuation of \(L/k\) with \(k\)-dimension zero, rational rank \(r\), and valuation ring \(V\). Let \((S,N)\subset L\) be an \(n\)-dimensional local ring over \(k\) which is birationally dominated by \(V\). Let \(R=S\cap K\), \(M=N\cap K\), \(U=V\cap K\) and \(Q=MS\). (1) If \(r=n\), then \(S\) can be replaced by an iterated monoidal transform along \(v\) so that \(Q\) is \(N\)-primary; (2) If \(r<n\), then \(S\) can be replaced by an iterated monoidal transform along \(v\) so that \(\text{ht} Q\geq r+1\). In particular, if \(r=n-1\), then for such a transform \(Q\) is \(N\)-primary.
    0 references
    simultaneous resolution
    0 references
    valuations
    0 references
    monomialization
    0 references
    local uniformization
    0 references
    function field
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references