Comparison of three multicriteria methods to predict known outcomes

DOI10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00416-6zbMath0983.90031WikidataQ126667840 ScholiaQ126667840MaRDI QIDQ5937716

David L. Olson

Publication date: 12 July 2001

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

decision theorymultiple criteria analysis

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Related Items (11)

PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications ⋮ Comparison of two multicriteria decision aid methods: Net Flow and Rough Set Methods in a high yield pulping process ⋮ Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods ⋮ RELATIVE RATIO METHOD FOR MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING PROBLEMS ⋮ An output‐oriented classification of multiple attribute decision‐making techniques based on fuzzy c‐means clustering method ⋮ Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. ⋮ Multicriteria approach to data envelopment analysis ⋮ Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models ⋮ Methods for aggregating intuitionistic uncertain linguistic variables and their application to group decision making ⋮ Rough sets for pattern classification using pairwise-comparison-based tables ⋮ A multi-attribute ranking solutions confirmation procedure

Uses Software

• ELECTRE

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Implementation of the centroid method of Solymosi and Dombi
• Note—A Preference Ranking Organisation Method
• Problems and methods with multiple objective functions

This page was built for publication: Comparison of three multicriteria methods to predict known outcomes