Two simple examples for understanding posterior \(p\)-values whose distributions are far from unform
From MaRDI portal
Publication:375219
DOI10.1214/13-EJS854zbMath1294.62049MaRDI QIDQ375219
Publication date: 29 October 2013
Published in: Electronic Journal of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ejs/1382448225
62F03: Parametric hypothesis testing
62F15: Bayesian inference
62C10: Bayesian problems; characterization of Bayes procedures
Related Items
Modeling for Dynamic Ordinal Regression Relationships: An Application to Estimating Maturity of Rockfish in California, Why preferring parametric forecasting to nonparametric methods?, Bayesian threshold selection for extremal models using measures of surprise, Posterior predictive \(p\)-values with Fisher randomization tests in noncompliance settings: test statistics vs discrepancy measures, Approximation of Bayesian predictive \(p\)-values with regression ABC, Latent likelihood ratio tests for assessing spatial kernels in epidemic models, A simple method for comparing complex models: Bayesian model comparison for hierarchical multinomial processing tree models using Warp-III bridge sampling, Posterior predictive checking of multiple imputation models
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Rejoinder: Bayesian checking of the second levels of hierarchical models
- Bayesianly justifiable and relevant frequency calculations for the applied statistician
- Posterior predictive \(p\)-values
- A STATISTICAL PARADOX
- Diagnostic Checks for Discrete Data Regression Models Using Posterior Predictive Simulations
- P Values for Composite Null Models
- Asymptotic Distribution of P Values in Composite Null Models
- A Bayesian Formulation of Exploratory Data Analysis and Goodness‐of‐fit Testing*
- Comment: Bayesian checking of the second levels of hierarchical models