Statistical mechanics of the US supreme court
From MaRDI portal
Publication:513001
DOI10.1007/s10955-015-1253-6zbMath1360.82025arXiv1306.5004OpenAlexW3106017648MaRDI QIDQ513001
Edward D. Lee, Chase P. Broedersz, William Bialek
Publication date: 3 March 2017
Published in: Journal of Statistical Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.5004
Voting theory (91B12) Statistical mechanics of random media, disordered materials (including liquid crystals and spin glasses) (82D30) Lattice systems (Ising, dimer, Potts, etc.) and systems on graphs arising in equilibrium statistical mechanics (82B20)
Related Items
A random energy approach to deep learning, Resolution and relevance trade-offs in deep learning, Statistical criticality arises in most informative representations, Partisan intuition belies strong, institutional consensus and wide Zipf's law for voting blocs in US Supreme Court, Maximal relevance and optimal learning machines, Computational geometry and the U.S. Supreme Court
Cites Work