Bounding-surface plasticity: Stress space versus strain space

DOI10.1007/BF01379741zbMath0692.73035OpenAlexW2082137223MaRDI QIDQ583934

P. J. Yoder, David L. McDowell

Publication date: 1989

Published in: Acta Mechanica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01379741

zbMATH Keywords

hardeningPrager-type

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Plastic materials, materials of stress-rate and internal-variable type (74C99)

Related Items (3)

A robust kinematic hardening rule for cyclic plasticity with ratchetting effects. II: Application to nonproportional loading cases ⋮ The equivalence of stress- and strain-based plasticity theories ⋮ Integral-equation representations of flow elastoplasticity derived from rate-equation models

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• A model of nonlinearity hardening materials for complex loading
• The significance of formulating plasticity theory with reference to loading surfaces in strain space
• On the Numerical Implementation of Elastoplastic Models
• A Two Surface Model for Transient Nonproportional Cyclic Plasticity, Part 1: Development of Appropriate Equations
• A Two Surface Model for Transient Nonproportional Cyclic Plasticity, Part 2: Comparison of Theory With Experiments
• On the Formulation of Strain-Space Plasticity With Multiple Loading Surfaces
• On the Characterization of Strain-Hardening in Plasticity
• Plastic Internal Variables Formalism of Cyclic Plasticity
• An Evaluation of Recent Developments in Hardening and Flow Rules for Rate-Independent, Nonproportional Cyclic Plasticity

This page was built for publication: Bounding-surface plasticity: Stress space versus strain space