Representing the strengths and directions of pairwise comparisons

DOI10.1016/j.ejor.2003.10.025zbMath1071.90548MaRDI QIDQ706886

David B. Hartvigsen

Publication date: 9 February 2005

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.10.025

zbMATH Keywords

Decision analysis; Pairwise comparison; Ratio matrix

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

90B50: Management decision making, including multiple objectives

Related Items

Detecting and Debugging Erroneous Statements in Pairwise Comparison Matrices, A heuristic method to rectify intransitive judgments in pairwise comparison matrices, The mathematical equivalence of the ``spanning tree and row geometric mean preference vectors and its implications for preference analysis, Enumerating all spanning trees for pairwise comparisons, Preference elicitation from inconsistent judgments using multi-objective optimization, Deriving weights from general pairwise comparison matrices, Contribution of individual judgments toward inconsistency in pairwise comparisons, Further analysis on matrix operation of AHP

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices
• Consistent weights for judgements matrices on the relative importance of alternatives
• Deriving weights from pairwise comparison ratio matrices: An axiomatic approach
• A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio- scale matrices
• Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
• Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices