Does K-selection imply prudent predation?

DOI10.1016/0040-5809(84)90014-5zbMath0529.92023OpenAlexW1966403594WikidataQ57613789 ScholiaQ57613789MaRDI QIDQ787914

Marino Gatto, Carlo Matessi

Publication date: 1984

Published in: Theoretical Population Biology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(84)90014-5

zbMATH Keywords

predator-prey modelscompetition modelsK-selection

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Problems related to evolution (92D15) Ecology (92D40)

Related Items (4)

Long-term evolution of multilocus traits ⋮ A general minimum principle for competing populations: Some ecological and evolutionary consequences ⋮ The functional responses of adaptive consumers of two resources ⋮ A multilocus analysis of intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection on a quantitative trait

Cites Work

• Evolution and intraspecific exploitative competition I. One-locus theory for small additive gene effects
• Competition and the form of habitat shift
• Alternatives to Lotka-Volterra competition: Models of intermediate complexity
• Homage to the red queen. I. Coevolution of predators and their victims
• Asymptotic stability in singular perturbation problems. II: Problems having matched asymptotic expansion solutions
• Population growth regulated by intraspecific competition for energy or time: Some simple representations
• SOME GENERALIZED THEOREMS OF NATURAL SELECTION
• Coevolution of species in competition: a theoretical study.
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Does K-selection imply prudent predation?