Relevant restricted quantification

DOI10.1007/S10992-005-9008-5zbMath1111.03020OpenAlexW2081606282WikidataQ30052919 ScholiaQ30052919MaRDI QIDQ853811

Ross T. Brady, Greg Restall, Graham Priest, Allen P. Hazen, J. C. Beall

Publication date: 17 November 2006

Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-005-9008-5

zbMATH Keywords

paraconsistencyrelevant restricted quantification

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Substructural logics (including relevance, entailment, linear logic, Lambek calculus, BCK and BCI logics) (03B47) Paraconsistent logics (03B53)

Related Items (21)

TRANSFINITE CARDINALS IN PARACONSISTENT SET THEORY ⋮ Restriction by noncontraction ⋮ Paths to triviality ⋮ Restricted arrow ⋮ Connexive restricted quantification ⋮ A pragmatic dissolution of Curry's paradox ⋮ Proof-theoretic pluralism ⋮ The nature of information: a relevant approach ⋮ Aristotelian diagrams for semantic and syntactic consequence ⋮ Free of Detachment: Logic, Rationality, and Gluts ⋮ Paradox and logical revision. A short introduction ⋮ Contradictory Concepts ⋮ TRANSFINITE NUMBERS IN PARACONSISTENT SET THEORY ⋮ Logical pluralism: another application for chunk and permeate ⋮ Paraconsistent or Paracomplete? ⋮ The Difficulties in Using Weak Relevant Logics for Naive Set Theory ⋮ Some Comments and Replies ⋮ Inclosure and intolerance ⋮ Extensionality and restriction in naive set theory ⋮ INDICATIVE CONDITIONALS, RESTRICTED QUANTIFICATION, AND NAIVE TRUTH ⋮ Logic—The Big Picture

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• The American plan completed: Alternative classical-style semantics, without stars, for relevant and paraconsistent logics
• Classical relevant logics. I
• How to be really contraction free
• Four-valued semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals)

This page was built for publication: Relevant restricted quantification