Nonlinearities make a difference: comparison of two common Hill-type models with real muscle

DOI10.1007/s00422-007-0197-6zbMath1149.92302WikidataQ51899340 ScholiaQ51899340MaRDI QIDQ936112

Tobias Siebert, Walter Herzog, Reinhard Blickhan, Christian Rode, Olaf Till

Publication date: 12 August 2008

Published in: Biological Cybernetics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-007-0197-6

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

92C10: Biomechanics

Related Items

Dynamic Muscle Behaviours, The dynamics of the skeletal muscle: A systems biophysics perspective on muscle modeling with the focus on Hill‐type muscle models, Extracting low-velocity concentric and eccentric dynamic muscle properties from isometric contraction experiments, Equivalent linear damping characterization in linear and nonlinear force-stiffness muscle models, Titin-induced force enhancement and force depression: a `sticky-spring' mechanism in muscle contractions?, A multisegmental cross-bridge kinetics model of the myofibril, Hill equation and Hatze's muscle activation dynamics complement each other: enhanced pharmacological and physiological interpretability of modelled activity-pCa curves, A 3D-geometric model for the deformation of a transversally loaded muscle, Spreading out muscle mass within a Hill-type model: a computer simulation study, Fiber-based modeling and simulation of skeletal muscles, Parameter estimation and experimental design for Hill-type muscles: impulses from optimization-based modeling, Muscle torque generators in multibody dynamic simulations of optimal sports performance, How to model a muscle's active force-length relation: a comparative study

Cites Work

• Stability of bipedal stance: the contribution of cocontraction and spindle feedback
• Stabilizing function of antagonistic neuromusculoskeletal systems: an analytical investigation