Statistical paradises and paradoxes in big data. I: Law of large populations, big data paradox, and the 2016 US presidential election
Publication:1624804
DOI10.1214/18-AOAS1161SFzbMath1405.62241OpenAlexW2883811944MaRDI QIDQ1624804
Publication date: 16 November 2018
Published in: The Annals of Applied Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1532743473
bias-variance tradeoffEuler identitydata confidentiality and privacydata defect correlationdata defect index (d.d.i.)data quality-quantity tradeoffMonte Carlo and quasi Monte Carlo (MCQMC)non-response biasparadoxes in big data
Applications of statistics to social sciences (62P25) Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05) Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01)
Related Items (13)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Rejection odds and rejection ratios: a proposal for statistical practice in testing hypotheses
- Struggles with survey weighting and regression modeling
- Statistics can lie but can also correct for lies: reducing response bias in NLAAS via Bayesian imputation
- On the absolute bias ratio of ratio estimators
- Nonresponse weighting adjustment using estimated response probability
- Inference and missing data
- Assessing the accuracy of the maximum likelihood estimator: Observed versus expected Fisher information
- Robust Models in Probability Sampling
- A Theory of Statistical Models for Monte Carlo Integration
- A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement From a Finite Universe
This page was built for publication: Statistical paradises and paradoxes in big data. I: Law of large populations, big data paradox, and the 2016 US presidential election