How Gaussian mixture models might miss detecting factors that impact growth patterns
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1647605
DOI10.1214/17-AOAS1066zbMath1393.62030OpenAlexW2791334082MaRDI QIDQ1647605
Brianna C. Heggeseth, Nicholas P. Jewell
Publication date: 26 June 2018
Published in: The Annals of Applied Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1520564471
Related Items (2)
How Gaussian mixture models might miss detecting factors that impact growth patterns ⋮ Assessment of agricultural sustainability in European union countries: a group-based multivariate trajectory approach
Uses Software
Cites Work
- An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model
- Estimating the dimension of a model
- A practical guide to splines
- Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife
- How Gaussian mixture models might miss detecting factors that impact growth patterns
- On Polya frequency functions. IV: The fundamental spline functions and their limits
- Unbalanced Repeated-Measures Models with Structured Covariance Matrices
- Cluster Analysis
- How Many Clusters? Which Clustering Method? Answers Via Model-Based Cluster Analysis
- Concomitant variables in finite mixture models
- Finite Mixture Modeling with Mixture Outcomes Using the EM Algorithm
- Dissimilarity measures for time trajectories
- General growth mixture modeling for randomized preventive interventions
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: How Gaussian mixture models might miss detecting factors that impact growth patterns