Assessing the accuracy of diagnostic probability estimation: evidence for defeasible modus ponens

DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2018.11.015zbMath1452.68227OpenAlexW2902584606WikidataQ128869459 ScholiaQ128869459MaRDI QIDQ1726353

Jean Baratgin, Jean-Louis Stilgenbauer

Publication date: 20 February 2019

Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2018.11.015

zbMATH Keywords

accuracyBrier scoredefeasible affirming the consequentdefeasible modus ponensdiagnostic probability estimationempirical studies of reasoning

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Uses Software

• R

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Abductive cognition. The epistemological and eco-cognitive dimensions of hypothetical reasoning
• On classifying abduction
• A logic for default reasoning
• An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Patterns of abduction
• An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning
• Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
• Abductive Inference

This page was built for publication: Assessing the accuracy of diagnostic probability estimation: evidence for defeasible modus ponens