Model validation for control and controller validation in a prediction error identification framework. II: Illustrations

DOI10.1016/S0005-1098(02)00235-2zbMath1015.93012OpenAlexW4232386917MaRDI QIDQ1868049

Michel Gevers, Brian D. O. Anderson, Xavier Bombois, Gérard Scorletti, Benoît Codrons

Publication date: 27 April 2003

Published in: Automatica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-1098(02)00235-2

zbMATH Keywords

disturbance rejectiontrackingsystem identificationrobust controlapplicationscontrol designmodel validationflexible mechanical systemprediction error identificationferrosilicon production processsimulation examples

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

System identification (93B30) Design techniques (robust design, computer-aided design, etc.) (93B51)

Related Items (7)

Iterative identification and control design with optimal excitation signals based on \(\upsilon \)-gap ⋮ Divination of closed-loop stability and performance via frequency response function estimates ⋮ Optimal experimental design and some related control problems ⋮ On the frequency domain accuracy of closed-loop estimates ⋮ From experiment design to closed-loop control ⋮ Discussion on: ``Robust control of identified models with mixed parametric and non-parametric uncertainties ⋮ Model validation for control and controller validation in a prediction error identification framework. I: Theory

Cites Work

• Closed-loop identification with an unstable or nonminimum phase controller
• Model validation for control and controller validation in a prediction error identification framework. I: Theory
• A flexible transmission system as a benchmark for robust digital control
• Digital QFT design for the benchmark problem
• Robust digital control of flexible transmissions using the combined pole placement/sensitivity function shaping method
• Asymptotic variance expressions for closed-loop identification

This page was built for publication: Model validation for control and controller validation in a prediction error identification framework. II: Illustrations