Measuring credibility of compensatory preference statements when trade-offs are interval determined
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1908003
DOI10.1007/BF01078981zbMATH Open0845.90007OpenAlexW2004488147MaRDI QIDQ1908003FDOQ1908003
Carlos A. Bana e Costa, Philippe Vincke
Publication date: 28 February 1996
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01078981
compensationmulticriteria decision aidcredibility indices of preferencesinterval tradeoffslinear additive modeloverall fuzzy preference relation
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- An analytical expression and an algorithm for the volume of a convex polyhedron in \(R^ n\).
- Multiple-attribute decision making with partial information: The comparative hypervolume criterion
- Partial Information, Dominance, and Potential Optimality in Multiattribute Utility Theory
- Ranking with Partial Information: A Method and an Application
- Decision making under uncertainty: Starr's domain criterion
- The use of domains in multicriteria decision making
- Some remarks on the notion of compensation in MCDM
- Problems and methods with multiple objective functions
- Binary preference indices: A new look on multicriteria aggregation procedures
- A geometric property of the boundary of symmetric convex bodies and convexity of flotation surfaces
- Multiple-attribute decision making with partial information: The expected-value criterion
Cited In (2)
This page was built for publication: Measuring credibility of compensatory preference statements when trade-offs are interval determined
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1908003)
