Measuring credibility of compensatory preference statements when trade-offs are interval determined

DOI10.1007/BF01078981zbMath0845.90007OpenAlexW2004488147MaRDI QIDQ1908003

Carlos A. Bana e Costa, Philippe Vincke

Publication date: 28 February 1996

Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01078981

zbMATH Keywords

compensationmulticriteria decision aidcredibility indices of preferencesinterval tradeoffslinear additive modeloverall fuzzy preference relation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Theory of fuzzy sets, etc. (03E72) Individual preferences (91B08)

Related Items (2)

Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA): Central Porto high-speed railway Station ⋮ An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• A geometric property of the boundary of symmetric convex bodies and convexity of flotation surfaces
• Decision making under uncertainty: Starr's domain criterion
• Some remarks on the notion of compensation in MCDM
• Binary preference indices: A new look on multicriteria aggregation procedures
• An analytical expression and an algorithm for the volume of a convex polyhedron in \(R^ n\).
• The use of domains in multicriteria decision making
• Partial Information, Dominance, and Potential Optimality in Multiattribute Utility Theory
• Ranking with Partial Information: A Method and an Application
• Multiple-attribute decision making with partial information: The comparative hypervolume criterion
• Multiple-attribute decision making with partial information: The expected-value criterion
• Problems and methods with multiple objective functions

This page was built for publication: Measuring credibility of compensatory preference statements when trade-offs are interval determined