On the importance of having an identity or, is consensus really universal?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1953645
DOI10.1007/s00446-005-0121-zzbMath1264.68026arXivcs/0201006OpenAlexW2567788443MaRDI QIDQ1953645
Harry Buhrman, Riccardo Silvestri, Alessandro Panconesi
Publication date: 7 June 2013
Published in: Distributed Computing (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0201006
Related Items (9)
Anonymous Processors with Synchronous Shared Memory: Monte Carlo Algorithms ⋮ Byzantine agreement with homonyms in synchronous systems ⋮ Uniform reliable broadcast in anonymous distributed systems with fair lossy channels ⋮ Anonymous and fault-tolerant shared-memory computing ⋮ The computational power of population protocols ⋮ The Synchronization Power of Coalesced Memory Accesses ⋮ Efficient randomized test-and-set implementations ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Byzantine agreement with homonyms
Cites Work
- The processor identity problem
- Computing in totally anonymous asynchronous shared memory systems
- Polylog randomized wait-free consensus
- Lower bounds for distributed coin-flipping and randomized consensus
- Fast randomized consensus using shared memory
- Unreliable failure detectors for reliable distributed systems
- The weakest failure detector for solving consensus
- Robust wait-free hierarchies
- The Las-Vegas Processor Identity Problem (How and When to Be Unique)
- Time- and Space-Efficient Randomized Consensus
- Randomized Consensus in Expected $O(N\log ^2 N)$ Operations Per Processor
- The asynchronous computability theorem for t-resilient tasks
- Efficient asynchronous consensus with the weak adversary scheduler
- Immediate atomic snapshots and fast renaming
This page was built for publication: On the importance of having an identity or, is consensus really universal?