Do we need the \(W^{(n>3)}\) constraints to solve the \((1,q)\) models coupled to \(2\)D gravity?

DOI10.1016/0550-3213(94)90433-2zbMath1007.81545arXivhep-th/9307073OpenAlexW2007852969MaRDI QIDQ1967625

Jacob Sonnenschein, Yoav Lavi

Publication date: 6 March 2000

Published in: Nuclear Physics. B (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9307073

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Two-dimensional field theories, conformal field theories, etc. in quantum mechanics (81T40) Infinite-dimensional groups and algebras motivated by physics, including Virasoro, Kac-Moody, (W)-algebras and other current algebras and their representations (81R10)

Related Items (1)

\((1,q=-1)\) model as a topological description of \(2\)D string theory

Cites Work

• Strings in less than one dimension and the generalized KdV hierarchies
• On holomorphic factorization of WZW and coset models
• Intersection theory on the moduli space of curves and the matrix Airy function
• Solving topological \(2\)D quantum gravity using Ward identities.
• THE ROLE OF THE CONTACT ALGEBRA IN MULTIMATRIX MODELS

This page was built for publication: Do we need the \(W^{(n>3)}\) constraints to solve the \((1,q)\) models coupled to \(2\)D gravity?