On the choice of weights for aggregating judgments in non-negotiable AHP group decision making

DOI10.1016/J.EJOR.2020.05.048zbMath1487.91026OpenAlexW3033223892MaRDI QIDQ2028867

Gabriella Marcarelli, Pietro Amenta, Antonio Lucadamo

Publication date: 3 June 2021

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.048

zbMATH Keywords

analytic hierarchy processFrobenius normmultiple criteria analysisoptimal weightscompatibility measure

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Related Items (5)

Research on the optimal aggregation method of judgment matrices based on spatial Steiner-Weber point ⋮ Incomplete pairwise comparison matrices based on graphs with average degree approximately 3 ⋮ Deriving the weights for aggregating judgments in a multi-group problem: an application to curriculum development in entrepreneurship ⋮ Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution ⋮ Group AHP framework based on geometric standard deviation and interval group pairwise comparisons

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• A peer-to-peer dynamic adaptive consensus reaching model for the group AHP decision making
• A heuristic approach for deriving the priority vector in AHP
• Consistent completion of incomplete judgments in decision making using AHP
• Achieving matrix consistency in AHP through linearization
• Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements
• Group preference aggregation in the multiplicative AHP. The model of the group decision process and Pareto optimality
• Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process
• Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages
• Singular value decomposition in AHP.
• Geometry of decision making and the vector space formulation of the analytic hierarchy process
• The ACT (STATIS method)
• Improving consistency in AHP decision-making processes
• Empirical properties of group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: theory and evidence
• A cosine maximization method for the priority vector derivation in AHP
• Dispersion of group judgments
• Solving the least squares method problem in the AHP for \(3 \times 3\) and \(4\times 4\) matrices
• Pareto Optimality and Equity in Social Decision Analysis
• A new rank correlation coefficient with application to the consensus ranking problem

This page was built for publication: On the choice of weights for aggregating judgments in non-negotiable AHP group decision making