Can \(p\)-values be meaningfully interpreted without random sampling?

DOI10.1214/20-SS129zbMath1443.62021OpenAlexW3013375568MaRDI QIDQ2191897

Claudia Becker, Sven Grüner, Antje Jantsch, Norbert Hirschauer, Oliver Mußhoff

Publication date: 26 June 2020

Published in: Statistics Surveys (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ssu/1585274548

zbMATH Keywords

random sampling\(p\)-valuespropensity scoressampling designsestimation and testingnon-random sampling

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to economics (62P20) Applications of statistics to social sciences (62P25) Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05) Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to statistics (62-02) Statistical block designs (62K10)

Uses Software

• Stata
• PracTools
• DOS

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Practical tools for designing and weighting survey samples
• Two-step estimation of panel data models with censored endogenous variables and selection bias
• Pitfalls of significance testing and \(p\)-value variability: an econometrics perspective
• Clustered data with small sample sizes: Comparing the performance of model-based and design-based approaches
• Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error: A Comment
• Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
• Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme
• Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences
• Microeconometrics
• Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”
• Five Nonobvious Changes in Editorial Practice for Editors and Reviewers to Consider When Evaluating Submissions in a Post p < 0.05 Universe
• The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
• Design of observational studies