A non-inferentialist, anti-realistic conception of logical truth and falsity

DOI10.1007/s11245-011-9111-xzbMath1308.03033OpenAlexW2010647050MaRDI QIDQ2339010

Heinrich Wansing

Publication date: 27 March 2015

Published in: Topoi (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-011-9111-x

zbMATH Keywords

trilattice \(\mathrm{SIXTEEN}_3\)told values

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items (3)

K3, Ł3, LP, RM3, A3, FDE, M: How to Make Many-Valued Logics Work for You ⋮ Interpolation in 16-valued trilattice logics ⋮ Analytic tableaux for all of \(\mathrm{SIXTEEN}_3\)

Cites Work

• Truth and falsehood. An inquiry into generalized logical values
• Some useful 16-valued logics: How a computer network should think
• Motivation and demotivation of a four-valued logic
• Hyper-contradictions, generalized truth values and logics of truth and falsehood
• On axiomatizing Shramko-Wansing's logic
• Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and `coupled trees'
• Reasoning with logical bilattices
• The power of Belnap: sequent systems for \(SIXTEEN_{3 }\)
• Generalized truth values.: A reply to Dubois
• SEQUENT CALCULI FOR SOME TRILATTICE LOGICS
• Constructive negation, implication, and co-implication
• On Ignorance and Contradiction Considered as Truth-Values
• A Remark on the Intersection of Tow Logics
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: A non-inferentialist, anti-realistic conception of logical truth and falsity