The Ontology of Bohmian Mechanics

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 21:17, 3 February 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240129110113)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Publication:2944391

DOI10.1093/BJPS/AXT019zbMath1319.81009arXiv1406.1371OpenAlexW2097150889MaRDI QIDQ2944391

Detlef Dürr, Michael Esfeld, Dustin Lazarovici, Mario Hubert

Publication date: 2 September 2015

Published in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The paper points out that the modern formulation of Bohm's quantum theory known as Bohmian mechanics is committed only to particles' positions and a law of motion. We explain how this view can avoid the open questions that the traditional view faces according to which Bohm's theory is committed to a wave-function that is a physical entity over and above the particles, although it is defined on configuration space instead of three-dimensional space. We then enquire into the status of the law of motion, elaborating on how the main philosophical options to ground a law of motion, namely Humeanism and dispositionalism, can be applied to Bohmian mechanics. In conclusion, we sketch out how these options apply to primitive ontology approaches to quantum mechanics in general.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.1371






Related Items (33)

Against fieldsSuper-Humeanism: a starving ontology``It from bit and quantum mechanicsBohmian mechanics: realism and the ``box experimentThe best of many worlds, or, is quantum decoherence the manifestation of a disposition?Quantum mechanics, time and ontologyThe primitive ontology of quantum physics: Guidelines for an assessment of the proposalsMulti-field and Bohm's theoryCan the ontology of Bohmian mechanics consists only in particles? The PBR theorem says noWave-functionalismHumeanism in light of quantum gravityLa BohumeCan Bohmian mechanics be made background independent?Charting the landscape of interpretation, theory rivalry, and underdetermination in quantum mechanicsWhy Scientific Realists Should Reject the Second Dogma of Quantum MechanicsInertial Trajectories in de Broglie-Bohm Quantum Theory: An Unexpected ProblemLoop quantum gravity: a new threat to humeanism? I: The problem of spacetimeStable facts, relative factsIntroduction: Space-time and the wave functionOne world, one beableLaws of nature and the reality of the wave functionBohmian dispositionsPrimitive ontology and quantum state in the GRW matter density theoryOn the conceptual issues surrounding the notion of relational Bohmian dynamicsA proposal for a Bohmian ontology of quantum gravityThe wave-function as a multi-fieldCould wavefunctions simultaneously represent knowledge and reality?Relativistic Bohmian mechanics revisited: a covariant reformulation for spin-1/2 particlesInterpretive analogies between quantum and statistical mechanicsTabletop experiments for quantum gravity are also tests of the interpretation of quantum mechanicsThe point of primitive ontologyIs the statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics \(\psi\)-ontic or \(\psi\)-epistemic?De Broglie-Bohm theory, \textit{quo vadis}?





This page was built for publication: The Ontology of Bohmian Mechanics