Two Criteria for Evaluating Risk Prediction Models
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3100813
DOI10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01523.xzbMath1226.62122OpenAlexW2067667819WikidataQ35103714 ScholiaQ35103714MaRDI QIDQ3100813
Mitchell H. Gail, Ruth M. Pfeiffer
Publication date: 21 November 2011
Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3135785
Lua error in Module:PublicationMSCList at line 37: attempt to index local 'msc_result' (a nil value).
Related Items (7)
Subgroup specific incremental value of new markers for risk prediction ⋮ Estimating improvement in prediction with matched case-control designs ⋮ Adopting nested case-control quota sampling designs for the evaluation of risk markers ⋮ Methods for Evaluating Prediction Performance of Biomarkers and Tests ⋮ Estimating Improvement in Prediction with Matched Case-Control Designs ⋮ Subgroup Specific Incremental Value of New Markers for Risk Prediction ⋮ Binary regression: Total gain in positive and negative predictive values
Cites Work
- Two further applications of a model for binary regression
- Convergence theorems for empirical Lorenz curves and their inverses
- Inference for Lorenz curve orderings
- Weak approximations for empirical Lorenz curves and their Goldie inverses of stationary observations
- A General Definition of the Lorenz Curve
- On criteria for evaluating models of absolute risk
- A Parametric ROC Model‐Based Approach for Evaluating the Predictiveness of Continuous Markers in Case–Control Studies
- Statistical inference for testing inequality indices with dependent samples
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: Two Criteria for Evaluating Risk Prediction Models