Two Criteria for Evaluating Risk Prediction Models

DOI10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01523.xzbMath1226.62122OpenAlexW2067667819WikidataQ35103714 ScholiaQ35103714MaRDI QIDQ3100813

Mitchell H. Gail, Ruth M. Pfeiffer

Publication date: 21 November 2011

Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3135785

zbMATH Keywords

discriminationLorenz curverisk modelsdiscriminatory accuracy

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Related Items (7)

Subgroup specific incremental value of new markers for risk prediction ⋮ Estimating improvement in prediction with matched case-control designs ⋮ Adopting nested case-control quota sampling designs for the evaluation of risk markers ⋮ Methods for Evaluating Prediction Performance of Biomarkers and Tests ⋮ Estimating Improvement in Prediction with Matched Case-Control Designs ⋮ Subgroup Specific Incremental Value of New Markers for Risk Prediction ⋮ Binary regression: Total gain in positive and negative predictive values

Cites Work

• Two further applications of a model for binary regression
• Convergence theorems for empirical Lorenz curves and their inverses
• Inference for Lorenz curve orderings
• Weak approximations for empirical Lorenz curves and their Goldie inverses of stationary observations
• A General Definition of the Lorenz Curve
• On criteria for evaluating models of absolute risk
• A Parametric ROC Model‐Based Approach for Evaluating the Predictiveness of Continuous Markers in Case–Control Studies
• Statistical inference for testing inequality indices with dependent samples
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Two Criteria for Evaluating Risk Prediction Models