Self-Adjusting Binary Search Trees: What Makes Them Tick?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3452794
DOI10.1007/978-3-662-48350-3_26zbMath1466.68032arXiv1503.03105OpenAlexW1924246083MaRDI QIDQ3452794
László Kozma, Mayank Goswami, Thatchaphol Saranurak, Parinya Chalermsook, Kurt Mehlhorn
Publication date: 19 November 2015
Published in: Algorithms - ESA 2015 (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.03105
Related Items (13)
An exact characterization of saturation for permutation matrices ⋮ On minimum generalized Manhattan connections ⋮ Self-Adjusting Binary Search Trees: What Makes Them Tick? ⋮ A study on splay trees ⋮ Better analysis of binary search tree on decomposable sequences ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Smooth Heaps and a Dual View of Self-Adjusting Data Structures ⋮ Pairing heaps: the forward variant. ⋮ Belga B-trees ⋮ Finding and counting permutations via CSPs ⋮ Multi-Finger Binary Search Trees ⋮ Competitive Online Search Trees on Trees
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Sequential access in splay trees takes linear time
- Path balance heuristic for self-adjusting binary search trees
- Self-Adjusting Binary Search Trees: What Makes Them Tick?
- Self-adjusting binary search trees
- Self-Organizing Binary Search Trees
- On the Dynamic Finger Conjecture for Splay Trees. Part II: The Proof
- Generalized Template Splay: A Basic Theory and Calculus
- An Explanation of Splaying
- Upper Bounds for Maximally Greedy Binary Search Trees
This page was built for publication: Self-Adjusting Binary Search Trees: What Makes Them Tick?