On Testing a Subroutine for the Numerical Integration of Ordinary Differential Equations

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 03:28, 6 February 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240129110113)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Publication:4044075

DOI10.1145/321784.321786zbMath0292.65039OpenAlexW1999312387MaRDI QIDQ4044075

Fred T. Krogh

Publication date: 1973

Published in: Journal of the ACM (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/321784.321786




Related Items (40)

A variable parameter embedded DIRK algorithm for the numerical integration of stiff systems of ODEsA new stepsize strategy for explicit Runge-Kutta codesA simple step size selection algorithm for ODE codesVariable-step boundary value methods based on reverse Adams schemes and their grid redistributionA composite integration scheme for the numerical solution of systems of ordinary differential equationsA generalization to variable stepsizes of Störmer methods for second-order differential equationsSurvey of integral algorithms for ordinary differential equationsImplementation of defect correction methods for stiff differential equationsLow-order \(A_0\)-stable Adams-type correctorsThe art of writing a Runge-Kutta code. IIComparing numerical methods for stiff systems of O.D.E:sVariable order Adams codes.Embedded Runge-Kutta formulae with stable equilibrium statesParallel ODE-solvers with stepsize controlAutomatic integration of a stiff system using ellipsoidal norm of the error-vector for error-controlImplications of order reduction for implicit Runge-Kutta methodsA review of linear and nonlinear Cauchy singular integral and integro-differential equations arising in mechanicsIntegration of large chemical kinetic mechanisms via exponential methods with Krylov approximations to Jacobian matrix functionsAnalysis of a family of Chebyshev methods for \(y=f(x,y)\)A comparison of several invariant imbedding algorithms for the solution of two-point boundary-value problemsTwo-parameter families of predictor-corrector methods for the solution of ordinary differential equationsPlanetary theory developments, 1973?1976Local error control in codes for ordinary differential equationsDetecting stiffness with the Fehlberg (4,5) formulasStability properties of variable stepsize variable formula methodsA class of nonlinear multistep a-stable numerical methods for solving stiff differential equationsAdams-type methods with increased ranges of stabilityBibliography on the evaluation of numerical softwareEfficient integration of ordinary differential equations by transformationSolving stiff system by Taylor seriesConsistency and convergence of general linear multistep variable stepsize variable formula methodsLimiting Precision in Differential Equation SolversA probabilistic model for the numerical solution of initial value problemsSome New High-Order Multistep Formulae for Solving Stiff EquationsAn automatic multistep method for solving stiff initial value problemsVariable stepsize variable formula methods based on predictor-corrector schemesThe step sizes used by one-step codes for ODEsImplementation of a variable stepsize variable formula method in the time-integration part of a code for treatment of long-range transport of air pollutantsA note on the Enright updating techniqueA class of differential equations for testing variable step-size integration







This page was built for publication: On Testing a Subroutine for the Numerical Integration of Ordinary Differential Equations