Is the Tail Area Useful as an Approximate Bayes Factor?

DOI10.2307/2286921zbMath0352.62022OpenAlexW4237500341MaRDI QIDQ4122622

James M. Dickey

Publication date: 1977

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2286921

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Bayesian inference (62F15) Bayesian problems; characterization of Bayes procedures (62C10) Asymptotic properties of parametric tests (62F05)

Related Items (14)

Bayesian and frequentist evidence in one-sided hypothesis testing ⋮ A SUITABLE BAYESIAN APPROACH IN TESTING POINT NULL HYPOTHESIS: SOME EXAMPLES REVISITED ⋮ Bayesian inference given data `significant at \(\alpha\)': Tests of point hypotheses ⋮ Toward Replicability With Confidence Intervals for the Exceedance Probability ⋮ The Jeffreys-Lindley paradox and discovery criteria in high energy physics ⋮ Quasi-optimal Bayesian procedures of many hypotheses testing ⋮ Reconciling Bayesian and frequentist evidence in the point null testing problem ⋮ The agreement between the generalized \(p\) value and Bayesian evidence in the one-sided testing problem ⋮ The application of robust Bayesian analysis to hypothesis testing and Occam's Razor ⋮ A new Bayesian procedure for testing point null hypotheses ⋮ Generalized P-values and Bayesian evidence in the one-sided testing problems under exponential distributions ⋮ Robust Bayesian analysis: sensitivity to the prior ⋮ Lower bounds on Bayes factors for invariant testing situations ⋮ Comparison of the \(p\)-value and posterior probability

This page was built for publication: Is the Tail Area Useful as an Approximate Bayes Factor?