Computational Accuracy and Infinitesimals In Data Envelopment Analysis

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 18:21, 6 February 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240129110113)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Publication:4281933

DOI10.1080/03155986.1993.11732232zbMath0800.90086OpenAlexW2407754183MaRDI QIDQ4281933

Lawrence M. Seiford, Agha Iqbal Ali

Publication date: 10 March 1994

Published in: INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.1993.11732232




Related Items (30)

The role of non-Archimedean epsilon in finding the most efficient unit: with an application of professional tennis playersOn single-stage DEA models with weight restrictionsRecognizing the efficiency, weak efficiency and inefficiency of DMUs with an epsilon independent linear programDEA and the management of the product cycle: The U.S. computer industryA super-efficiency model based on improved outputs in data envelopment analysisA unified extension of super-efficiency in additive data envelopment analysis with integer-valued inputs and outputs: an application to a municipal bus systemAn epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA -- a third pole of technical efficiencyRefined bounds for the non-Archimedean \(\epsilon\) in DEAA consensual peer-based DEA-model with optimized cross-efficiencies -- input allocation instead of radial reductionOn piecewise loglinear frontiers and log efficiency measures.RED: a new method for performance ranking of large decision making unitsUsing input--output orientation model for determining most productive scale size in DEA.DEA and its uses in different countries.An integrated bi-objective data envelopment analysis model for measuring returns to scaleSelecting most efficient information system projects in presence of user subjective opinions: a DEA approachSolving DEA models in a single optimization stage: can the non-Archimedean infinitesimal be replaced by a small finite epsilon?On classifying decision making units in DEA: a unified dominance-based modelThe role of multiplier bounds in fuzzy data envelopment analysisAn input relaxation measure of efficiency in stochastic data envelopment analysisAn efficient approach for computing non-Archimedean \(\varepsilon\) in DEA based on integrated modelsContext-dependent performance standards in DEAThe overall assurance interval for the non-Archimedean epsilon in DEA models; a partition base algorithmDEA network computing in multi-stage parallel processesRank order data in DEA: a general frameworkNew data envelopment analysis models for classifying flexible measures: the role of non-Archimedean epsilonDEA congestion and returns to scale under an occurrence of multiple optimal projectionsEfficiency bounds in data envelopment analysisAn epsilon-based data envelopment analysis approach for solving performance measurement problems with interval and ordinal dual-role factorsDetermining assurance interval for non-Archimedean element in the improving outputs model in DEACross-efficiency aggregation in DEA models using the evidential-reasoning approach






This page was built for publication: Computational Accuracy and Infinitesimals In Data Envelopment Analysis