Does Error Control Suppress Spuriosity?

DOI10.1137/S0036142994276980zbMath0873.65083OpenAlexW2067819709MaRDI QIDQ4337463

Desmond J. Higham, D. F. Griffiths, Mark A. Aves

Publication date: 23 June 1997

Published in: SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/s0036142994276980

zbMATH Keywords

stabilityvariable stepsizeexplicit Runge-Kutta methodssteady stateslocal error controlspurious fixed points

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Nonlinear ordinary differential equations and systems (34A34) Stability and convergence of numerical methods for ordinary differential equations (65L20) Numerical methods for initial value problems involving ordinary differential equations (65L05) Multistep, Runge-Kutta and extrapolation methods for ordinary differential equations (65L06) Error bounds for numerical methods for ordinary differential equations (65L70) Mesh generation, refinement, and adaptive methods for ordinary differential equations (65L50)

Related Items (7)

Existence and stability of fixed points for a discretised nonlinear reaction-diffusion equation with delay ⋮ Dynamics of constant and variable stepsize methods for a nonlinear population model with delay ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Regular Runge-Kutta pairs ⋮ Analysis of the dynamics of local error control via a piecewise continuous residual ⋮ Spurios fixed points of a variable step size, variable order, predictor corrector algorithm ⋮ Low-storage, explicit Runge-Kutta schemes for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations

This page was built for publication: Does Error Control Suppress Spuriosity?