Why Ergodic Theory Does Not Explain the Success of Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4940978
DOI10.1093/bjps/47.1.63zbMath1133.82300OpenAlexW2053428210MaRDI QIDQ4940978
Publication date: 13 March 2000
Published in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/47.1.63
Related Items (14)
The pre-history of econophysics and the history of economics: Boltzmann versus the marginalists ⋮ Decoherence: the view from the history and philosophy of science ⋮ Chaos out of order: quantum mechanics, the correspondence principle and chaos ⋮ Quantum decoherence and the approach to equilibrium. II ⋮ Boltzmann and Gibbs: an attempted reconciliation ⋮ The ``past hypothesis: not even false ⋮ The ergodic hierarchy, randomness and Hamiltonian chaos ⋮ An empirical approach to symmetry and probability ⋮ Partial traces in decoherence and in interpretation: what do reduced states refer to? ⋮ ENTROPICAL ASPECTS IN AUDITORY PROCESSES AND PSYCHOACOUSTICAL LAW OF WEBER–FECHNER ⋮ The conceptual foundations of statistical physics. ⋮ Ergodic theory, interpretations of probability and the foundations of statistical mechanics ⋮ Had we but world enough, and time\dots But we don't!: justifying the thermodynamic and infinite-time limits in statistical mechanics ⋮ Quantum Decoherence and the Approach to Equilibrium
This page was built for publication: Why Ergodic Theory Does Not Explain the Success of Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics
