Assessing the Performance of Classification Methods

DOI10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00183.xzbMath1416.62339OpenAlexW1843749293MaRDI QIDQ4968542

David J. Hand

Publication date: 16 July 2019

Published in: International Statistical Review (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00183.x

zbMATH Keywords

sensitivityAUCperformance evaluationsignal detectiondiagnosiserror rateROC curvespecificitysupervised classificationH measure

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects) (62H30)

Related Items (7)

Making classifier performance comparisons when ROC curves intersect ⋮ Finding causative genes from high-dimensional data: an appraisal of statistical and machine learning approaches ⋮ Notes on the H-measure of classifier performance ⋮ On the optimal binary classifier with an application ⋮ A note on using the F-measure for evaluating record linkage algorithms ⋮ \(F^*\): an interpretable transformation of the F-measure ⋮ A criterion for the comparison of binary classifiers based on a stochastic dominance with an application to the sale of home insurances

This page was built for publication: Assessing the Performance of Classification Methods