Incompatible bounded category forcing axioms
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5094531
DOI10.1142/S0219061322500064WikidataQ114614777 ScholiaQ114614777MaRDI QIDQ5094531
Publication date: 3 August 2022
Published in: Journal of Mathematical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.03132
large cardinals; forcing axioms; bounded category forcing axioms; category forcing; projective resurrection
03E35: Consistency and independence results
03E55: Large cardinals
03E57: Generic absoluteness and forcing axioms
03E47: Other notions of set-theoretic definability
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Baumgartner's conjecture and bounded forcing axioms
- The bounded proper forcing axiom and well orderings of the reals
- Martin's maximum, saturated ideals, and nonregular ultrafilters. I
- Set theory. An introduction to independence proofs
- Forcing axioms and stationary sets
- Martin's maximum\(^{++}\) implies Woodin's axiom \((*)\)
- Resurrection axioms and uplifting cardinals
- Proper forcing and L(ℝ)
- Semiproper forcing axiom implies Martin maximum but not PFA+
- Canonical functions, non-regular ultrafilters and Ulam's problem on ω1
- Class Forcing in Class Theory
- On iterating semiproper preorders
- Absoluteness via resurrection
- Bounded Martin's Maximum, weak Erdӧs cardinals, and ψAc
- Set Theory
- SET MAPPING REFLECTION
- Transfinite open-point games
- Martin's maximum revisited