Fitting logistic multilevel models with crossed random effects via Bayesian Integrated Nested Laplace Approximations: a simulation study
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5106968
DOI10.1080/00949655.2017.1341886zbMath1492.62060arXiv1607.05981MaRDI QIDQ5106968
Leonardo Grilli, Francesco Innocenti
Publication date: 22 April 2020
Published in: Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.05981
random effects; generalized linear mixed models; INLA; binary response; salamander mating data; crossed random effects; maximum likelihood via Laplace approximation; non-hierarchical data
62F15: Bayesian inference
62J12: Generalized linear models (logistic models)
65C20: Probabilistic models, generic numerical methods in probability and statistics
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Maximum likelihood estimation of limited and discrete dependent variable models with nested random effects
- Sensitivity analysis for Bayesian hierarchical models
- Alternating imputation posterior estimation of models with crossed random effects
- Improving the INLA approach for approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models
- Accuracy of Laplace approximation for discrete response mixed models
- Bayesian computing with INLA: new features
- Penalising model component complexity: a principled, practical approach to constructing priors
- Sensitivity analysis in Bayesian generalized linear mixed models for binary data
- Approximate Bayesian Inference for Latent Gaussian models by using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximations
- Bayesian inference for generalized linear mixed models
- Maximum Likelihood Variance Components Estimation for Binary Data
- Approximate Inference in Generalized Linear Mixed Models
- Bayesian estimation with integrated nested Laplace approximation for binary logit mixed models
- A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models
- Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (Comment on article by Browne and Draper)