scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3249761

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 03:25, 7 March 2024 by Import240305080351 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240305080351)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Publication:5536612

zbMath0155.33601MaRDI QIDQ5536612

G. Frege

Publication date: 1967


Title: zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.



Related Items (34)

Frege's double correlation thesis and Quine's set theories NF and MLThe Composition of ThoughtsRussell, His Paradoxes, and Cantor's Theorem: Part IMATHEMATICAL INFERENCE AND LOGICAL INFERENCEFrege's cardinals as concept-correlatesGrundgesetze der Arithmetik I \S\S 29-32Quasi-Topological Structure of Extensions Within Logic of Typicals and Atypicals (LTA)On rereading van Heijenoort's selected essaysLogic as a science and logic as a theory: remarks on Frege, Russell and the logocentric predicamentFrege's Cardinals Do Not Always Obey Hume's PrincipleOn fundamental differences between dependent and independent meaningsFrege on Indirect ProofA logical analysis of the Anselm's \textit{Unum argumentum} (from \textit{Proslogion})The Cube Generalizing Aristotle’s Square in Logic of Determination of Objects (LDO)Domains of Sciences, Universes of Discourse and Omega ArgumentsIncomplete understanding of complex numbers. Girolamo Cardano: a case study in the acquisition of mathematical conceptsModalities in Sociological ArgumentsMathematical beauty, understanding, and discoveryOn Translating Frege'sDie Grundlagen der ArithmetikFrege's proof of referentialityDefinition in mathematicsFrege’s UnificationFrege on referentiality and Julius Caesar in \textit{Grundgesetze} Section 10On Russell's vulnerability to Russell's paradoxRussell's Paradox in Appendix B of the Principles of Mathematics : Was Frege's response adequate?Russell's 1903 - 1905 Anticipation of the Lambda CalculusFrege, Carnap, and Explication: ‘Our Concern Here Is to Arrive at a Concept of Number Usable for the Purpose of Science’Realism bei Frege. Reply to T. Burge: Frege on knowing the third realmNotes on naive semanticsFrege, the identity ofSinnand Carnap's intensionDid Frege Solve One of Zeno’s Paradoxes?DEDUCTIVE CARDINALITY RESULTS AND NUISANCE-LIKE PRINCIPLESAmending Frege's \textit{Grundgesetze der Arithmetik}Standard quantification theory in the analysis of English




This page was built for publication: