Divergence versus decisionP‐values: A distinction worth making in theory and keeping in practice: Or, how divergenceP‐values measure evidence even when decisionP‐values do not
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5889489
DOI10.1111/SJOS.12625OpenAlexW4313933074MaRDI QIDQ5889489
Publication date: 21 April 2023
Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.02478
decision theoryhypothesis testingmodel checkingstatistical geometrydivergence measuresstatistical informationsignificance testfalsificationism\(P\)-value\(S\)-valuessurprisals
Related Items (7)
Connecting simple and precise P‐values to complex and ambiguous realities (includes rejoinder to comments on “Divergence vs. decision P‐values”) ⋮ Statistical evidence and surprise unified under possibility theory ⋮ Non-Experimental Data, Hypothesis Testing, and the Likelihood Principle: A Social Science Perspective ⋮ Evidential Calibration of Confidence Intervals ⋮ Comments on Divergence vs. Decision P‐values: A Distinction Worth Making in Theory and Keeping in Practice – or, How Divergence P‐values Measure Evidence Even When Decision P‐values Do Not by Greenland in Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 2023 ⋮ Discussion of: ``Specifying prior distributions in reliability applications ⋮ On some publications of Sir David Cox
This page was built for publication: Divergence versus decisionP‐values: A distinction worth making in theory and keeping in practice: Or, how divergenceP‐values measure evidence even when decisionP‐values do not
