Small scale distribution of zeros and mass of modular forms (Q1644488)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 12:55, 23 October 2024 by Daniel (talk | contribs) (‎Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q129796100, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1729684397485)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Small scale distribution of zeros and mass of modular forms
scientific article

    Statements

    Small scale distribution of zeros and mass of modular forms (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    21 June 2018
    0 references
    In this article, the authors study the equidistribution of zeros and mass of holomorphic Hecke cusp forms \(f\) of weight \(k\) with respect to \(\text{SL}_2(\mathbb Z)\) at small scales. They consider the distribution of zeros of \(f\) in two domains \(B(z,r_k)\) and \(\mathcal{F}_Y\) separately. Here \(B(z,r_k)\) is a hyperbolic ball contained in the canonical fundamental domain \(\mathcal{F}\) of \(\text{SL}_2(\mathbb Z)\) centered at \(z\) and of radius \(r_k\) with \(r_k\rightarrow 0\) sufficiently slowly as \(k\longrightarrow\infty\) and \(\mathcal{F}_Y\) is a neighborhood of the cusp of \(\mathcal{F}\) such that \(\mathcal{F}_Y=\{z\in \mathcal{F}~:~\text{Im}(z)>Y\},~~Y\geq\sqrt{k\log k}\). They show the following results: Let \(N_f(D)\) be the number of zeros of \(f\) in a domain \(D\) and \(A(D)\) the area of \(D\) by hyperbolic measure. Let \(B(z_0,r)\subset \{z\in\mathcal{F}~:~\text{Im}(z)\leq B\}\) for a fixed \(B>0\) and \(r\geq(\log k)^{-\delta_0/2+\varepsilon}\), where \(\delta_0=31/8-\sqrt{15}\). Then \(\frac{N_f(B(z_0,r))}{N_f(\mathcal{F)}}=\frac{A(B(z_0,r))}{A(\mathcal{F})}+O_B(r(\log k)^{-\delta_0/2+\varepsilon})~(k\rightarrow\infty)\). Further, if assuming the generalized Lindelöf hypothesis, in the above, the factor \((\log k)^{-\delta_0/2+\varepsilon}\) can be replaced by the smaller factor \(k^{-1/8+\varepsilon}\) for \(r\geq k^{-1/8+\varepsilon}\). As for the distribution of zeros in \(\mathcal{F}_Y\), \textit{A. Ghosh} and \textit{P. Sarnak} [J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 14, No. 2, 465--487 (2012; Zbl 1287.11054)] conjectured that almost all zeros \(\rho_f\) of \(f\) in \(\mathcal{F}_Y\) lie on two lines \(L_1:\text{Re}(z)=0,L_2:\text{Re}(z)=-1/2\) and gave a lower bound on the number of zeros on these lines. The authors show for almost all cusp forms \(f\) that \(\sharp\{\rho_f\in L_i\}\geq c(\varepsilon)\cdot \sharp\{\rho_f\in \mathcal{F}_Y\} ~(i=1,2)\), provided that \(\delta(\varepsilon)k>Y>\sqrt{k\log k}\) and \(k\rightarrow\infty\). The constants \(\delta(\varepsilon)\) and \(c(\varepsilon)\) are positive and depend only on \(\varepsilon\). Under the generalized Lindelöf hypothesis, they give a lower bound on the number of zeros on the line \(L_i\), which is significantly stronger than the previous results. Furthermore they show the following effective mass equidistribution for the mass of \(y^k|f(z)|\):~Let \(\phi\) be a smooth function supported in \(\mathcal{F}\) with \(\sup_{z\in\mathcal{F}}\left|y\frac{\partial^a}{\partial x^a}\frac{\partial^b}{\partial y^b}\phi(z)\right|\ll_{a,b}M^{a+b}\), \((z=x+iy, a,b,M\geq 1)\). Then,~ \(\left|\iint_{\mathcal{F}}y^k|f(z)|^2\phi(z)\frac{dxdy}{y^2}-\iint_{\mathcal{F}}\phi(z)\frac{dxdy}{y^2}\right|\ll_{\varepsilon}M^2(\log k)^{-4\delta_0+\varepsilon}, \) for all \(\varepsilon>0 \) fixed.
    0 references
    0 references
    zeros of modular forms
    0 references
    mass equidistribution
    0 references
    automorphic forms
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references