A Non-linear Hardening Model Based on Two Coupled Internal Hardening Variables: Formulation and Implementation (Q3407171)
From MaRDI portal
![]() | This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: A Non-linear Hardening Model Based on Two Coupled Internal Hardening Variables: Formulation and Implementation |
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A Non-linear Hardening Model Based on Two Coupled Internal Hardening Variables: Formulation and Implementation |
scientific article |
Statements
A Non-linear Hardening Model Based on Two Coupled Internal Hardening Variables: Formulation and Implementation (English)
0 references
3 March 2010
0 references
This article discusses the properties of a Riemannian manifold $(N,g_{N})$ and an almost quaternionic Hermitian manifold $(M,E,g_{M})$, related through an almost h-semi-slant Riemannian map $F$. The key result is that for $\theta_{R}=\frac{\pi}{2}$, the differential map $\phi_{R}$ and the 1-form $\omega_{R}$ are both zero on the tangent bundle of the kernel of $F_{*}$. This leads to the conclusion that $F_{*}(\widehat{R}(X))=0$ for $X\in\Gamma(\ker F_{*})$, as well as the identity $\nabla^{T}_{Y}Z=\widehat{R}(\nabla_{Y}Z)$ holding true for all $Y,Z\in\Gamma(\mathcal{D}_{1})$. (English)
0 references
SIMPLE: This article discusses a mathematical proposition related to an almost h-semi-slant Riemannian map from an almost quaternionic Hermitian manifold $(M,E,g_{M})$ to a Riemannian manifold $(N,g_{N})$. The goal is to prove that $\phi_{R}^{2}X = -\cos^{2}\theta_{R}X$ for $X \in \Gamma(\mathcal{D}_{2}^{R})$ and $R \in \{I,J,K\}$, where $\{I,J,K\}$ is an almost h-semi-slant basis with angles $\{\theta_{I},\theta_{J},\theta_{K}\}$. The author starts by defining necessary notations and tensor fields, then proceeds to consider the components of these tensors, particularly for $Z = \nabla_{X}Y - \nabla_{Y}X$. They use properties of tensor fields to expand and simplify the expression. Finally, they note that $[X,Y] \in \Gamma(\ker F_{*})$ leads to their result (3.12). (English)
0 references