An attempt to interpret the Weil explicit formula from Beurling's spectral theory (Q627628)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 23:03, 9 December 2024 by Import241208061232 (talk | contribs) (Normalize DOI.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
An attempt to interpret the Weil explicit formula from Beurling's spectral theory
scientific article

    Statements

    An attempt to interpret the Weil explicit formula from Beurling's spectral theory (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    3 March 2011
    0 references
    Let \(\rho=\beta+i\gamma\) be the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta-function. For certain functions \(F\) and for \(0<u<1,\nu\in{\mathbb R}\) the authors prove that \[ \lim_{T\to\infty}\sum_{|\gamma|<T} e^{\nu(\rho-1/2)}\int_{-\infty}^\infty F(\tfrac xu)e^{x(\rho-1/2)}\,dx=M(u,\nu)+R(u,\nu), \] where \[ M(u,\nu)=\begin{cases} 0,&\nu\neq \pm \log m, m=1,2,3,\dots\\ -\frac{\Lambda(m)}{m^{\frac 12}}F(0),&\nu=\pm \log m, m=2,3,4,\dots\\ -F(0)\log(2\pi u)-\int_0^\infty\left(\frac{F(x)+F(-x)}{2}-F(0)e^{-x}\right)\,\frac{dx}{x},&\nu=0 \end{cases} \] and \[ R(u,\nu)=O(u),u\to 0. \] If the Riemann hypothesis is true, then \[ R(u,0)=-2u\int_0^\infty\left(N(\lambda)-\frac{\lambda}{2\pi}\log\frac{\lambda}{2\pi}+\frac{\lambda}{2\pi}\right) \frac{d}{d\lambda}\left(\frac{\hat{F}(-u\lambda)+\hat{F}(u\lambda)}{2}\right)\,d\lambda, \] where \(N(\lambda)\) is the number of \(\rho=\frac 12+i\gamma\) in the range \(0<\gamma<\lambda\) counted with multiplicity, and \(\hat{F}\) is the Fourier transform of \(F\).
    0 references
    Riemann zeta-function
    0 references
    non-trivial zeros
    0 references
    explicit formula
    0 references

    Identifiers