Constructive logic with strong negation is a substructural logic. I (Q931408)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 08:39, 10 December 2024 by Import241208061232 (talk | contribs) (Normalize DOI.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Constructive logic with strong negation is a substructural logic. I
scientific article

    Statements

    Constructive logic with strong negation is a substructural logic. I (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    25 June 2008
    0 references
    This is the first half of two papers in which the authors show that the constructive logic with strong negation N is definitionally equivalent to a certain axiomatic extension of the substructural logic FLew, namely the full Lambek calculus with exchange and weakening. In this paper it is shown by an extensive use of the automated theorem prover PROVER9 that the variety of Nelson algebras and a certain variety of FLew-algebras are term-equivalent, which answers to a long-standing question of Nelson's asking whether the Nelson algebras form a variety of certain residuated lattices. The result establishes the above-mentioned definitional equivalence of the two deductive systems in the sequel to conclude that the logic N is a substructural logic over FLew.
    0 references
    constructive logic
    0 references
    strong negation
    0 references
    substructural logic
    0 references
    Nelson algebra
    0 references
    residuated lattice
    0 references
    variety
    0 references
    full Lambek calculus with exchange and weakening
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references