Pages that link to "Item:Q1367679"

The following pages link to A noncooperative view of consistent bankruptcy rules (Q1367679):

Displaying 42 items.

• A non-cooperative mechanism for the Shapley value of airport problems (Q256597) (← links)
• A new approach for bounding awards in bankruptcy problems (Q404776) (← links)
• Axiomatic and strategic justifications for the constrained equal benefits rule in the airport problem (Q417688) (← links)
• A noncooperative approach to bankruptcy problems with an endogenous estate (Q490162) (← links)
• A bargaining procedure leading to the serial rule in games with veto players (Q492793) (← links)
• Flow sharing and bankruptcy games (Q532705) (← links)
• Non-cooperative solutions for estate division problems (Q719873) (← links)
• A noncooperative view on two airport cost sharing rules (Q843748) (← links)
• Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims (Q857974) (← links)
• Protective properties and the constrained equal awards rule for claims problems: A note (Q862532) (← links)
• For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules (Q889256) (← links)
• For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules (Q908189) (← links)
• A non-cooperative interpretation of the \(f\)-just rules of bankruptcy problems (Q926886) (← links)
• On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency (Q952680) (← links)
• Implementing cooperative solution concepts: a generalized bidding approach (Q1006585) (← links)
• Fixed price plus rationing: an experiment (Q1020595) (← links)
• A characterization of the nucleolus for convex games (Q1268632) (← links)
• Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey. (Q1398381) (← links)
• Relations among the central rules in bankruptcy problems: a strategic perspective (Q1735767) (← links)
• A study of the nucleolus in the nested cost-sharing problem: axiomatic and strategic perspectives (Q1753274) (← links)
• The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems. (Q1867795) (← links)
• A strategic justification of the constrained equal awards rule through a procedurally fair multilateral bargaining game (Q2021552) (← links)
• A strategic justification of the Talmud rule based on lower and upper bounds (Q2021809) (← links)
• From jungle to civilized economy: the power foundation of exchange economy equilibrium (Q2098999) (← links)
• A sequential partition method for non-cooperative games of bankruptcy problems (Q2146372) (← links)
• Loss sharing: characterizing a new class of rules (Q2203497) (← links)
• Equal-quantile rules in resource allocation with uncertain needs (Q2231431) (← links)
• A proportional approach to claims problems with a guaranteed minimum (Q2255891) (← links)
• Foundations for contest success functions (Q2268135) (← links)
• On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study (Q2268386) (← links)
• Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update (Q2344375) (← links)
• Coalitional stochastic stability in games, networks and markets (Q2345208) (← links)
• Characterization of the Reverse Talmud bankruptcy rule by exemption and exclusion properties (Q2355089) (← links)
• Taxation and poverty (Q2362199) (← links)
• Coalitional games with veto players: consistency, monotonicity and Nash outcomes (Q2384445) (← links)
• On the investment implications of bankruptcy laws (Q2435893) (← links)
• Additive adjudication of conflicting claims (Q2689416) (← links)
• NON-COOPERATIVE AND AXIOMATIC CHARACTERIZATIONS OF THE AVERAGE LEXICOGRAPHIC VALUE (Q3011204) (← links)
• Implementation with evidence (Q4683689) (← links)
• Equal Area Rule to Adjudicate Conflicting Claims (Q5111110) (← links)
• Strategic justifications of the TAL family of rules for bankruptcy problems (Q6074891) (← links)
• Divide and choose: an informationally robust strategic approach to bankruptcy problems (Q6114947) (← links)