Pages that link to "Item:Q2655056"
From MaRDI portal
The following pages link to How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts? (Q2655056):
Displaying 13 items.
- Estimating common mean and heterogeneity variance in two study case meta-analysis (Q449391) (← links)
- Restricted likelihood representation and decision-theoretic aspects of meta-analysis (Q470058) (← links)
- Estimating common parameters in heterogeneous random effects models (Q546103) (← links)
- An efficient numerical algorithm for exact inference in meta analysis (Q4960567) (← links)
- Outlier detection and accommodation in meta-regression models (Q5078481) (← links)
- Quantifying uncertainty in method of moments estimates of the heterogeneity variance in random effects meta‐analysis (Q6068491) (← links)
- Jointly pooling aggregated effect sizes and their standard errors from studies with continuous clinical outcomes (Q6068838) (← links)
- Inference using an exact distribution of test statistic for random-effects meta-analysis (Q6175809) (← links)
- Heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comprehensive overview (Q6590283) (← links)
- Sensitivity analysis with iterative outlier detection for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (Q6618445) (← links)
- A penalization approach to random-effects meta-analysis (Q6622254) (← links)
- A note on the empirical Bayes heterogeneity variance estimator in meta-analysis (Q6625169) (← links)
- Multistep estimators of the between-study covariance matrix under the multivariate random-effects model for meta-analysis (Q6630320) (← links)
