The following pages link to Is Hume's principle analytic? (Q5937843):
Displayed 21 items.
- Comparing Peano arithmetic, Basic Law V, and Hume's Principle (Q450961) (← links)
- Frege's other program (Q558436) (← links)
- Neo-Fregeanism: an embarrassment of riches (Q558727) (← links)
- Bad company and neo-Fregean philosophy (Q1036084) (← links)
- Hume's big brother: Counting concepts and the bad company objection (Q1036087) (← links)
- Bad company tamed (Q1036088) (← links)
- Introduction to the special issue on the bad company problem (Q1036090) (← links)
- On the origin and status of our conception of number (Q1860966) (← links)
- Realism and paradox (Q1860967) (← links)
- Frege meets Dedekind: A neologicist treatment of real analysis (Q1860971) (← links)
- Abstraction and set theory (Q1860973) (← links)
- Bad company objection to Joongol Kim's adverbial theory of numbers (Q2053369) (← links)
- Rescuing implicit definition from abstractionism (Q2080582) (← links)
- Hume's Principle and Axiom V reconsidered: Critical reflections on Frege and his interpreters (Q2500801) (← links)
- The enhanced indispensability argument, the circularity problem, and the interpretability strategy (Q2695151) (← links)
- LOGICISM, INTERPRETABILITY, AND KNOWLEDGE OF ARITHMETIC (Q2940868) (← links)
- RELATIVE CATEGORICITY AND ABSTRACTION PRINCIPLES (Q3195592) (← links)
- WHAT RUSSELL SHOULD HAVE SAID TO BURALI–FORTI (Q4600824) (← links)
- DEDUCTIVE CARDINALITY RESULTS AND NUISANCE-LIKE PRINCIPLES (Q5024503) (← links)
- FOR BETTER AND FOR WORSE. ABSTRACTIONISM, GOOD COMPANY, AND PLURALISM (Q5880430) (← links)
- Grounding and auto-abstraction (Q6066990) (← links)