A Comparison of Active Flux Methods for the Vlasov-Poisson System

DOI10.48550/arXiv.2607.23133MaRDI QIDQ7284508zbMATH OpenarXivFDO

Authors Lukas Hensel, Gudrun Grünwald, Christiane Helzel, R. Grauer, Katharina Kormann, Yanick Kiechle, Rainer Grauer

Publication date 25 July 2026

Published in arXiv

Tldr We examine the accuracy and efficiency of these methods on both smooth and discontinuous solutions.

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.23133

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Hyperbolic conservation laws (35L65) Vlasov equations (35Q83) Finite volume methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs (65M08)

arXiv classification

math.NA

Cites work

• A Fully Discrete Truly Multidimensional Active Flux Method For The Two-Dimensional Euler Equations
• A positivity-preserving active flux method for the Vlasov-Poisson system
• A positivity-preserving high-order semi-Lagrangian discontinuous Galerkin scheme for the Vlasov-Poisson equations
• A split-step Active Flux method for the Vlasov-Poisson system
• Comparison of semi-Lagrangian discontinuous Galerkin schemes for linear and nonlinear transport simulations
• Conservative numerical schemes for the Vlasov equation
• Conservative semi-Lagrangian schemes for Vlasov equations
• Energy-conserving discontinuous Galerkin methods for the Vlasov-Maxwell system
• GEMPIC: Geometric ElectroMagnetic Particle-In-Cell Methods
• GEMPIC: Geometric ElectroMagnetic Particle-In-Cell Methods
• Practical symplectic partitioned Runge-Kutta and Runge-Kutta-Nyström methods
• The Serendipity Family of Finite Elements
• Tuning symplectic integrators is easy and worthwhile

This page was built for publication: A Comparison of Active Flux Methods for the Vlasov-Poisson System

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q7284508)