A Comparison of Two Methods for Adaptive Interim Analyses in Clinical Trials

DOI10.2307/3109775MaRDI QIDQ4666004zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Gernot Wassmer

Publication date 11 April 2005

Published in Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.2307/3109775

zbMATH Keywords

adaptive interium analysisclinical trialsearly stoppingType I error rate

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1369649
• A simulation program for adaptive two stage designs.
• A Calculus for Design of Two-Stage Adaptive Procedures
• Interim Analysis and Sample Size Reassessment
• On sample size and inference for two-stage adaptive designs

Cited in

(15)

• Basic concepts of group sequential and adaptive group sequential test procedures
• Robustness of sample size re-estimation with interim binary data for double-blind clinical trials
• Procedures for testing multiple endpoints in clinical trials: an overview
• Basic concepts of multiple tests -- a survey
• On sample size and inference for two-stage adaptive designs
• Adaptive group sequential designs for clinical trials: combining the advantages of adaptive and of classical group sequential approaches
• Adaptive Design for Censored Survival Data Adjusting for Covariates
• Estimation of a Parameter and Its Exact Confidence Interval Following Sequential Sample Size Reestimation Trials
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1332897 (Why is no real title available?)
• THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE CONCEPT OF A PROSPECTIVELY DESIGNED TWO-STAGE CLINICAL TRIAL
• Adaptive Sample Size Calculations in Group Sequential Trials
• Interim Analysis and Sample Size Reassessment
• Adaptive Design and Estimation in Randomized Clinical Trials with Correlated Observations
• A variational approach to optimal two-stage designs
• Twenty-five years of confirmatory adaptive designs: opportunities and pitfalls

This page was built for publication: A Comparison of Two Methods for Adaptive Interim Analyses in Clinical Trials

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4666004)