A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cited in
(22)- On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation
- From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum
- Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
- Abstract games of argumentation strategy and game-theoretical argument strength
- Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation using confirmation theory
- Gradual semantics for weighted bipolar SETAFs
- Using argument strength for building dialectical bonsai
- Connecting fuzzy logic and argumentation frames via logical attack principles
- On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation
- Weighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in Twitter
- Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation based on defeasible rules
- On restricting the impact of self-attacking arguments in gradual semantics
- An application of model checking games to abstract argumentation
- Optimization of dialectical outcomes in dialogical argumentation
- Reasoning on the web with assumption-based argumentation
- Uses and computation of imprecise probabilities from statistical data and expert arguments
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7238895 (Why is no real title available?)
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
- An empirical and axiomatic comparison of ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation
- Syntactic reasoning with conditional probabilities in deductive argumentation
- Audience irrelevance in strategic argumentation games
- Proportional acceptability of arguments
This page was built for publication: A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3532473)