A Prescriptive Approach for Eliciting Imprecise Weight Statements in an MCDA Process

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-04428-1_15MaRDI QIDQ3645314zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Mona Riabacke, Mats Danielson, Love Ekenberg, Aron Larsson

Publication date 17 November 2009

Published in Algorithmic Decision Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04428-1_15

zbMATH Keywords

elicitation processimprecise criteria weightsmulti-criteria decision making

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Case-oriented studies in operations research (90B90)

Recommendations

• Establishing dominance and potential optimality in multi-criteria analysis with imprecise weight and value.
• Effects of imprecise weighting in hierarchical preference programming
• A method for evaluating the performance of decision making units with imprecise data using common set of weights
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1241890
• A multicriteria decision aid methodology to deal with conflicting situations on the weights
• On the problem of weights in multiple criteria decision making (the noncompensatory approach)
• A method for estimating criteria weights from intuitionistic preference relations

Cited in

(2)

• A preference learning framework for multiple criteria sorting with diverse additive value models and valued assignment examples
• Augmenting ordinal methods of attribute weight approximation

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• DecideIT

This page was built for publication: A Prescriptive Approach for Eliciting Imprecise Weight Statements in an MCDA Process

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3645314)