A Survey of Reporting Practices of Computer Simulation Studies in Statistical Research

DOI10.1080/00031305.2017.1342692MaRDI QIDQ5882553zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Michael R. Harwell, Nidhi Kohli

Publication date 17 March 2023

Published in The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1342692

zbMATH Keywords

computer simulationdesign and data analysissurvey

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Cites work

• Comparison of designs for computer experiments
• Design and analysis of computer experiments. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors
• Do robust estimators work with real data?
• Jackknife estimation of mean squared error of small area predictors in nonlinear mixed models
• Markov chain Monte Carlo: can we trust the third significant figure?
• Measuring reproducibility of high-throughput experiments
• On the assessment of Monte Carlo error in simulation-based statistical analyses
• Sensitivity Analyses Comparing Outcomes Only Existing in a Subset Selected Post‐Randomization, Conditional on Covariates, with Application to HIV Vaccine Trials
• The design and analysis of computer experiments.
• The Number of MCMC Draws Needed to Compute Bayesian Credible Bounds
• The Reporting of Computation-Based Results in Statistics

Cited in

(1)

• On ``confirmatory methodological research in statistics and related fields

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• idr

This page was built for publication: A Survey of Reporting Practices of Computer Simulation Studies in Statistical Research

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5882553)