A comparison of Bayesian and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- A flexible, interpretable framework for assessing sensitivity to unmeasured confounding
- A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models
- Adjustment for Missing Confounders Using External Validation Data and Propensity Scores
- Assessing the Sensitivity of Regression Results to Unmeasured Confounders in Observational Studies
- Association, causation, and marginal structural models.
- Bayesian inference for partially identified models. Exploring the limits of limited data
- Case-control studies: Assessing the effect of a confounding factor
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1487684 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1439344 (Why is no real title available?)
- Interval estimation for messy observational data
- Multiple-Bias Modelling for Analysis of Observational Data
- Sensitivity Analysis: Distributional Assumptions and Confounding Assumptions
- The Impact of Prior Distributions for Uncontrolled Confounding and Response Bias
Cited in
(3)- A double machine learning approach for the evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness under the test-negative design: analysis of Québec administrative data
- A commentary on: ``A comparison of Bayesian and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding
- Bayesian sensitivity analysis for a missing data model
This page was built for publication: A comparison of Bayesian and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6998277)
